Blog

In today's hyper-connected world, the way we communicate has drastically evolved. Platforms once reserved for professional broadcasters are now accessible to everyone. But with this newfound freedom comes responsibility—and in Virginia, understanding the legal consequences of what's said online and over the air is crucial. Whether you're a content creator or a Virginia resident, this blog is your guide to navigating the complex landscape of online threats and broadcast profanity and understanding when an attorney might be your best ally.

The Digital Era and Its Legal Implications

The internet has democratized information, enabling anyone with a phone or computer to broadcast their thoughts to the world. However, with this capability comes a minefield of legal issues. In Virginia, laws around online threats and profanity are being stretched to accommodate this new digital reality. The purpose of this blog post is to arm you with the knowledge you need to stay on the right side of the law. Understanding these legal parameters can protect you from unintended consequences and help you maintain a positive presence online.

Where Virginia Law Stands on Online Threats

Virginia has specific statutes concerning online threats. These laws extend to cover threats made through digital communication channels such as social media, emails, and texts. The state takes these threats seriously, considering them as real as threats made in person. Online threats are categorized under Virginia Code § 18.2-60, which can result in severe penalties, including jail time. Even if you perceive your comment as a joke, if the recipient feels threatened, you could find yourself in legal trouble. Understanding this code is critical for anyone who communicates online. The implications of misinterpreted messages can be life-altering. Thus, it's vital to communicate clearly and responsibly in digital spaces.

The Complexities of Broadcast Profanity

While online threats are more clear-cut, profanity over the airwaves presents its own challenges. Virginia law has its own standards for what constitutes inappropriate language on public broadcasts. These laws are in place to maintain a certain level of decency in public communications. Profanity laws can be found under the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) guidelines, as they govern broadcast standards. While the FCC often focuses on major networks, local broadcasts and online streams still fall under its purview. Just because you're broadcasting online doesn't mean you're exempt from these rules. Violating broadcast profanity laws can lead to hefty fines and legal repercussions, affecting both your reputation and finances.

The Role of Intent and Context

When it comes to both online threats and broadcast profanity, intent, and context play significant roles. Virginia courts will often consider the intent behind a message or broadcast when determining if a law has been violated. However, proving intent can be complicated, especially in the digital world where tone and nuance can be lost. Even a statement made in jest can be interpreted as a threat or profanity if taken out of context. This complexity makes navigating these laws without legal guidance risky. Understanding this can better prepare you to communicate effectively while mitigating the risk of legal repercussions.

The Importance of Legal Counsel

Engaging the services of an attorney can be invaluable when navigating legal challenges related to online threats and broadcast profanity. A legal professional can provide guidance tailored to your specific situation, helping you understand your rights and responsibilities. Attorneys can assist in preemptively reviewing your content to identify potential legal issues before they arise. They can also represent you in court should legal action be taken against you. Having a knowledgeable attorney by your side can provide peace of mind, allowing you to focus on creating content without the fear of unforeseen legal consequences.

Protecting Your Interests in Digital Spaces

In conclusion, understanding the laws surrounding online threats and broadcast profanity in Virginia is crucial for content creators and online users. With the right knowledge and legal support, you can create impactful and compliant content. Remember, while the digital world offers vast opportunities, it also comes with responsibilities. Staying informed and proactive is your best defense against potential legal challenges. If you face legal uncertainty, consider contacting a qualified attorney who can guide you through the complexities of the law. Your digital presence is a valuable asset—protect it wisely. Call The Law Offices of Daniel J. Miller at (757) 267-4949 or contact our team to schedule a consultation online. 

In today's digital age, sharing images online has become as instinctual as breathing. With a few taps on your smartphone, you can instantly share a snapshot of your meal, a cute pet moment, or a stunning sunset. But not all images are innocuous. In Virginia, the dissemination of certain types of images can quickly land you in hot water. Whether you're a tech-savvy teenager or a seasoned social media user, understanding the potential legal repercussions of image sharing is crucial. In the following blog, we will explore why spreading images can lead to criminal charges and how an experienced attorney can guide you through these murky legal waters.

The Digital Age and Image Sharing

The digital world has transformed how we communicate, socialize, and conduct business. With smartphones in practically every hand, snapping a picture and sharing it online takes only seconds. Social media platforms have made it easier than ever to connect with others, allowing for instant image sharing across great distances. This connectivity, while revolutionary, also poses risks when images fall into the wrong hands or contain sensitive content. The ease of image sharing often blurs the lines between personal and public. While many use digital platforms to share harmless, everyday moments, others might inadvertently share images that carry legal risks. Understanding the implications of digital image dissemination is vital. Whether through messaging apps, social media, or email, each image shared holds the potential for unintended consequences. In Virginia, the law takes a firm stance on certain types of image dissemination, especially when privacy, consent, or explicit content is involved.

What Makes Image Dissemination Criminal?

Not every image shared online is benign. There are specific categories where sharing becomes a criminal act, mainly when it involves explicit content, invasion of privacy, or lack of consent. Understanding these criteria is essential for anyone using digital platforms to ensure they remain on the right side of the law.

In Virginia, the unlawful dissemination of images carries serious legal consequences, as detailed below:

• Explicit or obscene content without consent: Distributing images or videos featuring nudity or sexual acts without the subject's explicit permission is a criminal act that violates privacy and trust.
• Privacy infringement: Sharing images intended to remain private, especially those captured in intimate settings, breaches legal boundaries and subjects individuals to unauthorized exposure.
• Depiction of illegal activities or hate speech: Circulating images that incite violence, promote discrimination, or display unlawful acts can result in severe criminal charges.

Understanding the full spectrum of what constitutes criminal image dissemination is crucial for Virginia residents to prevent unintentional legal consequences.

The Consequences of Illegal Image Sharing

Illegal image dissemination carries significant penalties in Virginia, ranging from fines to imprisonment. The consequences vary depending on the nature of the images shared and the intent behind their dissemination. Understanding these potential repercussions is vital for anyone engaging in digital image sharing. In cases involving explicit content shared without consent, individuals may face serious charges, including felony charges. These charges carry severe penalties, including substantial fines and potential jail time. The laws aim to deter individuals from invading others' privacy and protect victims from exploitation or embarrassment. In addition to legal penalties, individuals caught in illegal image dissemination may face personal and professional consequences. A criminal record can significantly impact one's future, limiting employment opportunities and affecting personal relationships. The social stigma attached to such charges can cause long-lasting damage to one's reputation, further emphasizing the importance of understanding image dissemination laws. Victims of unauthorized image sharing may take civil action, seeking damages for the emotional distress caused. This adds another layer of complexity to the consequences of illegal image dissemination, highlighting the importance of respecting privacy and consent in all interactions.

Navigating Virginia's Legal Landscape and the Importance of Legal Awareness

Understanding Virginia's image dissemination is imperative, especially if you’ve been accused of violating the law. Consulting with a knowledgeable attorney can clarify the charges against you and help craft a defense strategy. Your attorney can also provide ongoing support as work your way through the legal process. Attorneys also offer guidance on issues like consent and privacy, helping to prevent legal issues and maintain a positive digital presence. Staying informed about what constitutes illegal image sharing, such as explicit content or privacy breaches, is crucial. Keeping up with changes in Virginia's laws and digital privacy regulations ensures compliance and empowers individuals to make informed decisions

Protecting Your Rights and Privacy

For Virginia residents, protecting one's rights and privacy in the digital age is paramount. Understanding the legal implications of image dissemination is the first step in safeguarding personal privacy and avoiding potential legal issues. Being proactive and informed can help individuals protect themselves and their loved ones from the negative consequences of illegal image sharing. One key aspect of protecting one's rights is understanding the importance of consent in image sharing. Always obtain explicit permission from individuals featured in images before sharing them publicly or privately. This practice not only respects others' privacy but also helps prevent legal complications. In addition to seeking consent, individuals should be cautious about the types of images they share online. Avoid sharing images that could be considered explicit, obscene, or infringing on someone's privacy. By exercising discretion and good judgment, Virginia residents can prevent unintentional legal issues and protect their digital reputation. Consulting with an experienced attorney can clarify the legality of sharing specific images. Attorneys with experience handling digital privacy and image dissemination issues can offer advice on best practices and help individuals make informed decisions. This proactive approach ensures compliance with Virginia's laws and protects individuals' rights and privacy.

The Role of Technology in Image Dissemination

Technology plays a significant role in the dissemination of images, both in facilitating sharing and in preventing unauthorized distribution. Understanding how technology influences image sharing can help individuals make informed decisions and protect their digital presence. Advancements in digital technology have made capturing and sharing images easier than ever. Smartphones, social media platforms, and messaging apps provide convenient avenues for image dissemination, but they also raise concerns about privacy and consent. Being aware of the potential risks associated with technology can help individuals make informed choices about sharing images.

On the other hand, technology also offers solutions for protecting images and preventing unauthorized sharing. Privacy settings on social media platforms, secure messaging apps, and encryption tools can help safeguard digital images and maintain privacy. Utilizing these technological solutions can provide peace of mind and reduce the risk of legal issues related to image dissemination. Additionally, technology can aid in uncovering instances of unauthorized image sharing. Reverse image search tools and digital watermarking can help identify instances of image misuse and track unauthorized distribution. These technological advancements empower individuals to protect their images and take action against those who violate their rights.

Next Steps in Your Legal Fight

In Virginia, the digital age has transformed how we share images and connect with others. While digital communication offers numerous benefits, it also presents legal challenges related to image dissemination. Understanding these challenges and navigating the legal landscape is crucial for Virginia residents to protect their rights and privacy. By staying informed about Virginia's laws, exercising discretion in image sharing, and seeking legal advice when necessary, individuals can avoid potential legal issues and maintain a positive digital presence. Legal awareness empowers individuals to make informed decisions, protect their privacy, and enjoy the benefits of digital communication responsibly. For those facing legal challenges related to image dissemination, consulting with an experienced attorney is often the best course of action. Legal guidance ensures individuals receive the best possible outcome in their case and protects their rights throughout the legal process. Call The Law Offices of Daniel J. Miller at (757) 267-4949 or contact our team to schedule a consultation online.

What You Should Know About Automatic Sealing

In 2021, Virginia passed a law introducing significant reforms to the state's criminal record-sealing policies. Aspects of this law were revised in 2023. This new law provides a valuable opportunity for individuals to move forward without the burden of a criminal history following them.

The automatic sealing provisions of this law will take effect on October 1, 2025.

Expungement vs. Sealing

In Virginia, expungement and sealing generally mean the same thing. Sealing records aims to limit public access to an individual's criminal history. While in some states, expungement completely erases a record, in Virginia, expungement and sealing both serve to limit access to the record in question.

While the record still exists, it will not appear in most background checks. Additionally, these records will be kept in a secure location and are only accessible to a few people and only for a few specific reasons, such as

Automatic Sealing of Records

Starting October 1, 2025, individuals charged with a misdemeanor in Virginia but ultimately not convicted may have their records automatically sealed. A non-conviction can occur under several circumstances, such as an acquittal, dismissed charges, or if the prosecution chooses to drop the case (nolle prosequi).

A note on dismissals: a deferral-dismissal does not qualify for automatic sealing, as this involves a court finding sufficient evidence for a potential conviction before the case is dismissed.

Eligibility for Automatic Sealing for Convictions

Individuals with convictions may also be eligible for the automatic sealing of their records under the new law. Specifically, they may be eligible if at least seven years have passed since the dismissal or conviction and the individual has maintained a clean legal record during this time. This means they must not have been convicted of any laws in Virginia or any other jurisdiction, including the District of Columbia or federal territories, that would necessitate reporting to the Central Criminal Records Exchange.

Requesting Sealing of Records in Virginia

In Virginia, individuals have the right to request the sealing of their criminal records, although the process differs depending on the circumstances of the case. If a record is eligible for automatic sealing due to the new law, individuals do not need to take any action, as the process will begin automatically on October 1, 2025.

However, if an individual believes their record should be sealed sooner or if it falls outside the automatic sealing provisions, they may file a petition with the court.

To initiate this process, individuals should gather relevant documentation, including case numbers, court dates, and any supporting evidence demonstrating that they meet the eligibility criteria. The petition must be submitted to the appropriate circuit court in Virginia, along with any required fees. Once filed, the court will review the request, and a hearing may be scheduled where the individual can present their case to seal the record.

Consider Hiring Legal Representation

It's important to note that the success of such requests can depend on various factors, including the nature of the charges and the individual's legal history. Consulting with a legal professional may provide additional guidance and potentially improve the likelihood of a favorable outcome.

If you have questions about the new criminal record-sealing law set to take effect in 2025, reach out to The Law Offices of Daniel J. Miller. We can help you determine how this law may impact your situation.

Individuals and couples with a high net worth face unique challenges when divorcing. Substantial asset holdings are often more complex than average and may even feature international real estate or offshore accounts. Unlike standard divorce proceedings, high-asset divorces often take longer to resolve due to the complexity of assets involved and the potential for significant financial implications.

High-asset individuals frequently face unique hurdles, such as:

• Complex property division
• Privacy concerns
• Potential for financial disputes
• Tax implications
• Valuation of unique or difficult-to-assess assets

Below, we discuss three significant aspects of divorce that high-net-worth couples should know about before they initiate a divorce.

Understanding Separate vs. Marital Property

In Virginia, property division during a divorce follows the equitable distribution model, which focuses on fair, though not necessarily equal, asset division. Property division settlements can be negotiated directly between parties with the assistance of their lawyers, through third-party mediation, or decided by a judge during litigation.

Before a couple's property is divided, it must first be categorized. Assets are classed as either marital or separate. Marital property includes assets acquired during the marriage, while separate property refers to assets owned individually before the marriage or acquired via inheritance or gift specifically to one spouse.

What About Hybrid Property?

A particularly challenging area is the concept of hybrid or commingled property—assets that have characteristics of both marital and separate property. For instance, if a spouse owned a business before marriage but its value increased during the marriage due to joint efforts, the business might be considered hybrid property, and all or part of it may be subject to division during a divorce. This complexity requires careful evaluation to determine how such assets should be divided.

Tips for preparing for property division when you have significant wealth include:

• Document all your assets thoroughly and carefully
• Keep detailed records, especially if assets are commingled
• Seek the advice of financial advisors and forensic accountants if necessary
• Be proactive about understanding the valuation process for various assets, especially those that may be unique or difficult to appraise
• Obtain appraisals from qualified professionals
• Consult with a tax advisor to get help in understanding the long-term financial impact of property division decisions

Protecting Your Privacy & Confidentiality

High-asset divorces often involve sensitive financial information that can become public through court filings and proceedings. This exposure can be detrimental, potentially affecting personal and professional reputations. Therefore, safeguarding privacy is a top priority.

Legal strategies to ensure confidentiality include opting for mediation or arbitration instead of litigation. These alternative dispute resolution methods offer a more private setting and can prevent sensitive details from becoming public.

Prepare for a Longer-Than-Average Process

High-asset divorces often involve intricate financial issues that require expert analysis. Financial professionals such as forensic accountants and business valuators frequently play critical roles in these cases. Consequently, the divorce process for many high-asset individuals can take longer than usual.

While the average divorce in Virginia is three to six months, a high-asset divorce can take up to a year (or, in some cases, longer).

Issues such as tax obligations, hidden assets, or offshore accounts can significantly complicate divorce proceedings. Addressing these challenges requires strategic planning and professional advice.

If you are facing a high-asset divorce, reach out to our law firm to schedule a consultation with one of our experienced divorce attorneys. We are here to guide you through the divorce process and help you understand how Virginia's divorce laws may impact your case.

What You Need to Know in Virginia

In today's rapidly evolving financial landscape, cryptocurrency has become a significant asset category. Its growing prevalence poses unique challenges in various legal contexts, including divorce proceedings. As more couples encounter the complexities of dividing digital assets like cryptocurrency, understanding how these assets should be handled becomes paramount.

Keep reading to learn more about how to approach the division of cryptocurrency during a divorce.

Understanding Cryptocurrency as a Marital Asset

Cryptocurrency (or "crypto") is a digital or virtual currency that relies on cryptography for security. Part of the appeal of cryptocurrency is that it is incredibly secure and difficult to counterfeit. Many people see crypto as the future.

However, unlike traditional assets, it operates on a decentralized platform, often providing users with a degree of anonymity. This decentralized nature, combined with the challenges of valuation, sets cryptocurrency apart from conventional financial assets when going through a divorce.

Equitable Distribution in VA

In Virginia, the law treats cryptocurrency like any other marital property subject to division upon divorce. Under Virginia's equitable distribution law, the court aims to divide marital assets fairly but not necessarily equally. Part of this process is identifying which property is marital (jointly owned) and which is separate (individually owned and not subject to division).

Marital property includes assets acquired during the marriage, while separate property refers to those owned before marriage or acquired by gift or inheritance. Hybrid assets, commingled between marital and separate holdings, may also be involved.

Factors the court may consider when dividing property in a divorce include:

• The monetary and non-monetary contributions of each spouse to the marital property.
• The duration of the marriage, which can impact the valuation of assets and the division process.
• The age and health of both spouses, as these factors can affect future income and needs.
• The standard of living established during the marriage, which may influence asset division to maintain a similar lifestyle post-divorce.
• The assets and liabilities of each spouse, including debts, which must be accounted for in the division.
• Any specific agreements between the spouses prior to divorce, such as prenuptial agreements, that outline property distribution.

Dividing Cryptocurrency in a Virginia Divorce

Virginia courts approach the division of cryptocurrency by considering several factors within the framework of equitable distribution. The courts may decide to split the assets between parties, assign a value to the cryptocurrency and compensate with other assets, or use a combination of these approaches.

Accurate documentation of cryptocurrency transactions and holdings is vital. This transparency helps present a clear financial picture to the court, facilitating a fair division process.

The Challenge of Valuing Cryptocurrency

Valuing cryptocurrency presents its own set of challenges due to its volatile nature and fluctuating market conditions. An asset’s value can change dramatically within short timeframes, complicating the division process. Thus, an expert valuation is often necessary to ensure an accurate assessment of the holdings at the time of divorce proceedings.

Hidden Cryptocurrency & Legal Remedies

When a spouse attempts to hide cryptocurrency assets, it complicates divorce proceedings. Employing strategies such as thorough financial investigations can mitigate this risk. Failure to disclose such assets can lead to serious consequences, as hiding assets constitutes fraud.

Identifying cryptocurrency holdings can be daunting. If you suspect your spouse owns cryptocurrency, look for common indicators, such as unexplained wealth or transactions. Legal discovery tools like subpoenas or hiring forensic accountants may also be helpful in uncovering hidden digital assets.

Legal remedies for divorce fraud can vary; if you suspect your spouse is hiding cryptocurrency assets, you're encouraged to consult with an experienced attorney to understand the specific options available.

The Importance of Legal Representation

Protecting your financial interests in divorce proceedings is critical, particularly when significant digital assets are involved. The complexities surrounding cryptocurrency can make achieving a swift divorce settlement challenging. A family law attorney well-versed in digital assets (like ours at The Law Offices of Daniel J. Miller) can be an invaluable asset during this process.

We invite you to schedule a consultation with us today to explore how we can assist you in this challenging process.

Understanding Miranda Rights

Miranda rights (also known as Miranda warnings) play a crucial role in the American criminal justice system. Miranda rights are derived from the Fifth Amendment, which guarantees that no person shall be compelled to incriminate themselves. Instituted to protect individuals from self-incrimination during police interrogations, these rights are grounded in the landmark 1966 Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona.

The Supreme Court determined that police must inform individuals in custody of their constitutional rights, including the right against self-incrimination and the right to legal counsel, before conducting interrogations.

When law enforcement officers arrest and intend to interrogate someone, they must inform the individual of their rights. These include:

• The right to remain silent
• The warning that anything said can be used against them in court
• The right to an attorney
• If they cannot afford an attorney, a public defender will be appointed

This safeguard helps make individuals aware of their constitutional protections before making any statements that could be self-incriminating.

When Are Officers Required to Issue Miranda Warnings?

In Virginia, as in all U.S. states, the concept of Miranda rights is upheld. State law enforcement officers are mandated to issue Miranda warnings before beginning any custodial interrogation. Failure to do so can have significant implications for the prosecution's case.

Miranda rights are not automatically applied at the time of arrest; they become relevant specifically during the custodial interrogation phase. Therefore, statements made pre-custody or without interrogative context might not invoke the necessity of a Miranda warning.

When Miranda Warnings Are Not Required

Remember, Miranda warnings are unnecessary before an arrest occurs or if someone is not being interrogated post-arrest. For example, when an officer pulls someone over for a DUI stop but has not initiated an arrest, they are not required to read someone their Miranda warning. Similarly, casual conversations or routine booking questions do not require the reading of Miranda rights. Additionally, voluntary statements made by suspects outside of interrogation do not warrant Miranda warnings.

Consequences of Not Reading Miranda Rights

When an arresting officer does not read Miranda rights to a suspect before an interrogation, the consequences can drastically affect any legal proceedings. The primary repercussion is the inadmissibility of any statements or confessions obtained during the interrogation.

The defendant could potentially argue that they were not informed of their rights and, therefore, did not knowingly and voluntarily waive those rights. As a result, any subsequent admission or evidence gathered from these statements may be considered 'fruit of the poisonous tree' and excluded from the trial.

Furthermore, a failure to administer Miranda rights can lead to broader challenges in the prosecution's case. In fact, non-compliance with Miranda requirements may even result in the dismissal of charges.

What to Do If You Believe Your Miranda Rights Were Violated

Miranda rights are a fundamental component of the criminal justice system. Both state and federal laws require these rights to be communicated to those in custody prior to interrogation. If you suspect that Miranda rights were not properly administered, seek knowledgeable legal support from an experienced defense attorney, like ours, at The Law Offices of Daniel J. Miller.

Contact us today for a consultation to discuss your case and explore your legal options.

Recently, the Virginia Court of Appeals addressed the issue of probable cause in relation to warrantless searches during a case involving a traffic stop in Culpeper. The court ruled that law enforcement officers must have more than just probable cause to search an individual without a warrant for contraband.

Judge Lisa M. Lorish emphasized in her opinion that under the Fourth Amendment, probable cause is the standard required to obtain a warrant but not alone sufficient to conduct a warrantless search.

Keep reading to learn more about search warrants, probable cause, and when a warrantless search may be allowed.

Search Warrants in Virginia

In addition to the Fourth Amendment, Virginia state law also addresses search warrants and the need for probable cause. Under § 19.2-52 of the Code of Virginia, search warrants can be issued by any authorized judge, magistrate, or other designated official. To issue a search warrant, the official must be presented with a sworn complaint and an affidavit establishing reasonable and probable cause for the search.

When is a Warrantless Search Allowed?

A warrantless search may be allowed under specific circumstances, such as when the individual consents, exigent circumstances demand immediate action, or the evidence is in plain view. Additionally, warrantless searches may be conducted during a lawful arrest, when there is a need to prevent the destruction of evidence, or if there is a reasonable belief that the suspect poses an imminent threat to public safety.

What Is Probable Cause

Probable cause is a legal standard used in various contexts, including arrests, searches, and obtaining warrants. It refers to the necessity for law enforcement to have reasonable grounds to believe that a person is committing, has committed, or will commit a crime. This standard is a safeguard, aiming to ensure citizens are not subjected to arbitrary or unjustified legal actions.

The Burden of Proof for Establishing Probable Cause

The burden of proof for establishing probable cause does not demand absolute certainty or conclusive evidence of criminal activity. Rather, it requires a reasonable basis or suspicion backed by factual evidence that would lead a prudent person to believe that a crime has been, is being, or will be committed.

The facts and circumstances used to justify probable cause must be more than mere suspicion or hunches; they should be concrete and substantiated by observable evidence or reliable information. For instance, an officer witnessing a person actively engaging in a crime or possessing illegal contraband can constitute probable cause.

Totality of the Circumstances

Virginia courts, like those elsewhere in the country, often use the "totality of the circumstances" test to evaluate whether probable cause exists. This approach considers all factors and contexts surrounding the situation rather than isolating individual elements. It takes into account the collective evidence and assesses whether it reasonably supports the belief of unlawful activity.

Application in Arrests & Searches

The principle of probable cause applies differently in the contexts of arrests and searches. For an arrest, law enforcement must have probable cause to believe that the individual has committed a crime. In the context of search warrants, officers must demonstrate that there is probable cause to believe that evidence of a crime will be found in the place they wish to search.

Example of Probable Cause Leading to a Search

Consider a situation where an officer pulls over a driver for speeding and observes a visible and identifiable controlled substance on the passenger seat. The officer's observation would likely constitute probable cause to search the vehicle. On the other hand, if the officer merely suspects the presence of drugs without any visible evidence or corroborative information, that suspicion alone would not meet the probable cause standard.

Remember, as previously mentioned, that while probable cause can be used to secure a warrant, it is not enough on its own to justify a warrantless search.

Challenging Probable Cause

Depending on the circumstances of the case, challenging probable cause can be part of a defendant's defense strategy. In such cases, our criminal defense attorneys meticulously examine the facts and circumstances that purportedly establish probable cause, identifying any problems or inconsistencies in the prosecution's case.

Potential ways to challenge probable cause include:

• Lack of concrete evidence
• Misinterpretation of facts or circumstances
• Insufficient corroboration
• Violation of constitutional rights
• Evidence of bias or prejudice
• Absence of exigent circumstances, such as a lawful arrest
• Failure to follow proper procedures

Each of these challenges aims to scrutinize the foundation and validity of the probable cause presented, potentially weakening the prosecution's stance and bolstering the defense's case.

Challenging probable cause will not be appropriate for every case. For personalized legal counsel, contact The Law Offices of Daniel J. Miller.

We are thrilled to announce that thanks to your incredible support and votes, we have won the Silver Place in Best Family Law Firm Southside Coastal Virginia Reader's Choice, published in July/August 2024 issue. This recognition means the world to us and serves as a testament to our commitment to excellence.

We extend our heartfelt gratitude to each and every one of you who took the time to vote and support us. Your loyalty and trust inspire us every day.

Here's to many more successes together!

Click here to view the full publication: Coastal Virginia Magazine